TTS API comparison 2026
Gradium TTS vs Cartesia Sonic 3.6 Gradium vs Cartesia · text-to-speech for voice agents
Gradium TTS is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 at or under 101 ms); Cartesia Sonic 3.6 is in the Visible delay speed tier (P95 of 320 ms or more). Below, each measure side by side with its source; a model leads on a measure only beyond the tie rule. No combined score, no overall winner.
Data read October 22, 2026 · Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis
Side by side
| Measure | Gradium TTS | Cartesia Sonic 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Speed tierCoval P95, 30 days | Headroom | Visible delay |
| Median time to first audioCoval, 30-day window | 55 ms | 296 ms |
| P95 time to first audio (slow turns)Coval, 30-day window | 101 ms | 380 ms |
| Time to first audio, board chartSpeko, US East | 55 ms | 130 ms |
| Naturalness EloSpeko | 1,592 | 1,578 |
| Listener Elo (95% interval)Artificial Analysis | 1,176 ±13 | 1,289 ±14 |
| Numbers and dates (0 to 1)Speko | 0.27 | 0.21 |
| List price per 1M charactersCoval, Speko, Artificial Analysis | $35.9 to $57.8 | $49 to $50 |
In bold: the model ahead on that measure. “tie”: latencies within 10 ms, or Elo scores whose 95% intervals overlap.
Where Gradium TTS is ahead
- →Median time to first audio: 55 ms vs 296 ms (Coval, 30-day window)
- →P95 time to first audio (slow turns): 101 ms vs 380 ms (Coval, 30-day window)
- →Time to first audio, board chart: 55 ms vs 130 ms (Speko, US East)
- →Naturalness Elo: 1,592 vs 1,578 (Speko)
- →Numbers and dates (0 to 1): 0.27 vs 0.21 (Speko)
- →List price per 1M characters: $35.9 to $57.8 vs $49 to $50 (Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis)
Where Cartesia Sonic 3.6 is ahead
- →Listener Elo (95% interval): 1,289 ±14 vs 1,176 ±13 (Artificial Analysis)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between Gradium TTS and Cartesia Sonic 3.6?
- Gradium TTS (Gradium) is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 at or under 101 ms); Cartesia Sonic 3.6 (Cartesia) is in the Visible delay speed tier (P95 of 320 ms or more). Gradium TTS leads on median time to first audio, P95 time to first audio (slow turns), time to first audio, board chart, naturalness Elo, numbers and dates (0 to 1) and list price per 1M characters; Cartesia Sonic 3.6 leads on listener Elo (95% interval). No combined score is computed.
- Which is faster for real-time voice agents, Gradium TTS or Cartesia Sonic 3.6?
- On Coval's 30-day window read on October 22, 2026, the median time to first audio is 55 ms for Gradium TTS and 296 ms for Cartesia Sonic 3.6 (Gradium TTS ahead by 241 ms); the P95, the slow turn, is 101 ms and 380 ms (Gradium TTS ahead by 279 ms). Gaps under 10 ms are ties.
- Which sounds more natural, Gradium TTS or Cartesia Sonic 3.6?
- Speko naturalness: 1,592 for Gradium TTS, 1,578 for Cartesia Sonic 3.6. Artificial Analysis listener Elo: 1,176 ±13 and 1,289 ±14. The two sources use different listeners and can disagree.
- How are these two text-to-speech APIs compared?
- Speed first, on Coval's median and P95 time to first audio; then voice quality (Speko, Artificial Analysis), accuracy on numbers and dates (Speko) and list price. Latencies within 10 ms and Elo scores whose intervals overlap are ties. Scores from different benchmarks are never added into one number.
- Can these numbers be checked?
- Yes. Each model page lists every measurement with its source and the date of the reading, and links to the benchmark page it comes from. The rules are on the methodology page.