Aller au contenu

TTS API comparison 2026

Gradium TTS vs Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS Gradium vs Google · text-to-speech for voice agents

Gradium TTS is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 at or under 101 ms); Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS is in the no speed tier (not measured by Coval). Below, each measure side by side with its source; a model leads on a measure only beyond the tie rule. No combined score, no overall winner.

Data read October 22, 2026 · Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis

Side by side

Measure Gradium TTS Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS
Speed tierCoval P95, 30 days Headroomnot measured
Median time to first audioCoval, 30-day window 55 ms —
P95 time to first audio (slow turns)Coval, 30-day window 101 ms —
Time to first audio, board chartSpeko, US East 55 ms 481 ms
Naturalness EloSpeko 1,592 1,639
Listener Elo (95% interval)Artificial Analysis 1,176 ±13 1,251 ±13
Numbers and dates (0 to 1)Speko 0.27 0.73
List price per 1M charactersCoval, Speko, Artificial Analysis $35.9 to $57.8 $10 to $11

In bold: the model ahead on that measure. “tie”: latencies within 10 ms, or Elo scores whose 95% intervals overlap.

Where Gradium TTS is ahead

  • →Time to first audio, board chart: 55 ms vs 481 ms (Speko, US East)
Gradium TTS: all measurements →

Where Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS is ahead

  • →Naturalness Elo: 1,639 vs 1,592 (Speko)
  • →Listener Elo (95% interval): 1,251 ±13 vs 1,176 ±13 (Artificial Analysis)
  • →Numbers and dates (0 to 1): 0.73 vs 0.27 (Speko)
  • →List price per 1M characters: $10 to $11 vs $35.9 to $57.8 (Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis)
Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS: all measurements →

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Gradium TTS and Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS?
Gradium TTS (Gradium) is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 at or under 101 ms); Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS (Google) is in the no speed tier (not measured by Coval). Gradium TTS leads on time to first audio, board chart; Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS leads on naturalness Elo, listener Elo (95% interval), numbers and dates (0 to 1) and list price per 1M characters. No combined score is computed.
Which is faster for real-time voice agents, Gradium TTS or Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS?
Only Gradium TTS is measured by Coval (median 55 ms, P95 101 ms); Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS has no speed tier, so the two cannot be compared on the same window.
Which sounds more natural, Gradium TTS or Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS?
Speko naturalness: 1,592 for Gradium TTS, 1,639 for Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS. Artificial Analysis listener Elo: 1,176 ±13 and 1,251 ±13. The two sources use different listeners and can disagree.
How are these two text-to-speech APIs compared?
Speed first, on Coval's median and P95 time to first audio; then voice quality (Speko, Artificial Analysis), accuracy on numbers and dates (Speko) and list price. Latencies within 10 ms and Elo scores whose intervals overlap are ties. Scores from different benchmarks are never added into one number.
Can these numbers be checked?
Yes. Each model page lists every measurement with its source and the date of the reading, and links to the benchmark page it comes from. The rules are on the methodology page.

More comparisons

Compare two other TTS APIs →