TTS API comparison 2026
Gradium TTS vs Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview Gradium vs Fish Audio · text-to-speech for voice agents
Gradium TTS is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 under 120 ms); Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview is in the Fast enough speed tier (P95 from 120 ms to 293 ms). Below, each measure side by side with its source; a model leads on a measure only beyond the tie rule. No combined score, no overall winner.
Figures as of October 27, 2026 · Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis, Cekura
Side by side
| Measure | Gradium TTS | Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Speed tierCoval P95, 30 days | Headroom | Fast enough |
| Median time to first audioCoval, 30-day window | 54 ms | 146 ms |
| P95 time to first audio (slow turns)Coval, 30-day window | 104 ms | 209 ms |
| Time to first audio, board chartSpeko, US East | 55 ms | — |
| Time to first audio, full sentence (median)Cekura | 76 ms | 321 ms |
| Time to first audio, text streamed word by word (median)Cekura | -64 ms | 312 ms |
| Naturalness EloSpeko | 1,592 | not rated |
| Listener Elo (95% interval)Artificial Analysis | 1,174 ±13 | 1,245 ±14 |
| Numbers and dates (0 to 1)Speko | 0.27 | not rated |
| Hard passages pronounced correctly (95% interval)Artificial Analysis, human reviewers | not tested | 93.2% (91.2 to 95.1) |
| Reading accuracy on hard textCekura, transcriber-scored | 79.5% | 91.3% |
| List price per 1M charactersCoval, Speko, Artificial Analysis, Cekura | $36 to $57.8 | $15 |
In bold: the model ahead on that measure. “tie”: latencies within 10 ms, or Elo scores whose 95% intervals overlap.
Where Gradium TTS is ahead
- →Median time to first audio: 54 ms vs 146 ms (Coval, 30-day window)
- →P95 time to first audio (slow turns): 104 ms vs 209 ms (Coval, 30-day window)
- →Time to first audio, full sentence (median): 76 ms vs 321 ms (Cekura)
- →Time to first audio, text streamed word by word (median): -64 ms vs 312 ms (Cekura)
Where Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview is ahead
- →Listener Elo (95% interval): 1,245 ±14 vs 1,174 ±13 (Artificial Analysis)
- →Reading accuracy on hard text: 91.3% vs 79.5% (Cekura, transcriber-scored)
- →List price per 1M characters: $15 vs $36 to $57.8 (Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis, Cekura)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between Gradium TTS and Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview?
- Gradium TTS (Gradium) is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 under 120 ms); Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview (Fish Audio) is in the Fast enough speed tier (P95 from 120 ms to 293 ms). Gradium TTS leads on median time to first audio, P95 time to first audio (slow turns), time to first audio, full sentence (median) and time to first audio, text streamed word by word (median); Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview leads on listener Elo (95% interval), reading accuracy on hard text and list price per 1M characters. No combined score is computed.
- Which is faster for real-time voice agents, Gradium TTS or Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview?
- On Coval's 30-day window as of October 27, 2026, the median time to first audio is 54 ms for Gradium TTS and 146 ms for Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview (Gradium TTS ahead by 92 ms); the P95, the slow turn, is 104 ms and 209 ms (Gradium TTS ahead by 105 ms). Gaps under 10 ms are ties.
- Which sounds more natural, Gradium TTS or Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview?
- Speko naturalness: 1,592 for Gradium TTS, not rated for Fish Audio Drama 3 Preview. Artificial Analysis listener Elo: 1,174 ±13 and 1,245 ±14. The two sources use different listeners and can disagree.
- How are these two text-to-speech APIs compared?
- Speed first, on Coval's median and P95 time to first audio; then voice quality (Speko, Artificial Analysis), accuracy on numbers and dates (Speko) and list price. Latencies within 10 ms and Elo scores whose intervals overlap are ties. Scores from different benchmarks are never added into one number.
- Can these numbers be checked?
- Yes. Each model page lists every measurement with its source and the date of the reading, and links to the benchmark page it comes from. The rules are on the methodology page.